Back to Models

GLM-5.3-Flash

zaizai/glm-5.3-flash

Z.AI GLM-5.3-Flash β€” the cost tier of the 5.3 generation. Documented by the vendor under its VLM section: text parameters match GLM-5.3 and it additionally accepts image_url content blocks, so it is multimodal on input. Reasoning is always on.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cost tier of Z.AI's 5.3 generation. It carries the same 1M-token context and always-on reasoning as the GLM-5.3 flagship, but adds image_url input β€” making it the first model in the GLM-5.x line to accept vision alongside text β€” while priced at roughly one-ninth of GLM-5.3's token cost. The vendor documents it under the VLM section rather than a standalone page, and its text parameters are stated to match GLM-5.3 exactly.

The practical routing split between Flash and the flagship comes down to three factors: image input, token cost, and latency. GLM-5.3-Flash is the right route when the request includes an image β€” it is the only text-generation model in the GLM-5.3 generation that accepts image_url content blocks. For text-only tasks, it is the budget choice when the peak coding performance of the flagship is unnecessary. At $0.162/M input and $0.54/M output on TheRouter, GLM-5.3-Flash sits among the more competitively priced 1M-context multimodal models in the catalog.

Like GLM-5.3, the Flash variant requires reasoning to always be on. The thinking.type: "disabled" path is gone; applications that previously disabled thinking must switch to reasoning_effort: "low" before calling either model. The three effort levels β€” low, high, max β€” are available on both routes, and TheRouter exposes reasoning_effort in the supported_parameters list for direct pass-through.

Best for
  • β€’ Vision-aware workflows in the GLM-5.3 generation: document screenshots, diagram understanding, code-with-image context, or UI-to-code tasks where image_url blocks are required and GLM-5.3's text-only route is insufficient
  • β€’ High-volume text tasks where GLM-5.3-Flash's ~9x lower token cost is the deciding factor β€” batch summarisation, classification, extraction, and lightweight agentic loops that do not need the flagship's top coding benchmark scores
  • β€’ Latency-sensitive reasoning tasks where reasoning_effort: "low" combined with Flash's lower price gives a cheaper, faster path than the GLM-5.3 flagship at the same effort level
  • β€’ Multi-modal agent pipelines that combine image parsing with text reasoning in a single 1M-context window β€” the Flash route avoids a separate vision-model hop for moderately complex visual inputs
Reach for something else if
  • β€’ Maximum coding or agentic benchmark performance β€” the GLM-5.3 flagship's post-training advantages on Terminal Bench 3.0, DeepSWE, and CyberGym are not guaranteed to transfer to Flash; use the flagship for high-stakes engineering work
  • β€’ Callers that need thinking.type: "disabled" β€” reasoning cannot be turned off in GLM-5.3-Flash any more than in GLM-5.3; always budget for reasoning tokens, and use reasoning_effort: "low" to trim overhead
  • β€’ Production vision pipelines with demanding image-quality requirements β€” no independent benchmark data is available for the Flash vision path; validate image understanding quality on your representative inputs before committing at scale

How TheRouter serves this differently from the vendor

As the vendor operates it

Z.AI documents GLM-5.3-Flash under the VLM section with text parameters matching GLM-5.3 and additional image_url input support. Context is 1M tokens, reasoning is always on (effort: low/high/max). No separate Flash pricing page has been extracted.

On TheRouter

TheRouter exposes zai/glm-5.3-flash through the OpenAI Chat Completion surface with 1M context, 131,072 max completion tokens, text+image input, text output, tools, tool_choice, response_format, and reasoning_effort. Pricing is $0.162/M input and $0.54/M output.

Context Length
1M
Max Output
131K
Input Priceper 1M tokens
$0.162/ 1M tokens
Output Priceper 1M tokens
$0.540/ 1M tokens

Modalities

textimage→text

Capabilities

Vision

Pricing Breakdown

TypeRate
Input$0.162 / 1M tokens
Output$0.540 / 1M tokens

Supported Parameters

temperaturemax_tokenstop_ptoolstool_choiceresponse_formatstopreasoning_effort

Specifications

Context window1M tokensdocs.z.ai β†—verified
Maximum output tokens131,072 tokens on the active TheRouter routetherouter.ai β†—verified
ModalitiesText + image input, text output (vision-capable)docs.z.ai β†—verified
Image inputimage_url content blocks accepted; documented in the Z.AI VLM sectiondocs.z.ai β†—verified
ReasoningAlways on; thinking.type is fixed at enabled. Three effort levels: low (lightweight), high (enhanced), max (deep, default). Disabling is not supported.docs.z.ai β†—verified
TheRouter pricing$0.162/M input tokens; $0.54/M output tokenstherouter.ai β†—verified
Cost vs GLM-5.3 flagshipApproximately 8.6x cheaper on input, 8.1x cheaper on outputtherouter.ai β†—verified
API capabilitiesFunction calling, streaming, structured output, reasoning effort control, image_url vision inputdocs.z.ai β†—verified
Generation familyGLM-5.3 generation; text parameters match GLM-5.3 flagship; documented under VLM sectiondocs.z.ai β†—verified
Training data cutoffNot publicly disclosedunknown

Benchmarks

BenchmarkDistributionScoreSource
DeepSWE v1.1 (GLM-5.3 flagship, generation reference)
Vendor-reported score for the GLM-5.3 flagship from the Z.AI model page. No separate Flash score has been published; this row provides generation-context only and should not be treated as a Flash score.
66.9docs.z.ai β†—
Z.ai Code Bench Max (GLM-5.3 flagship, generation reference)
Vendor-reported score for the GLM-5.3 flagship from Z.AI docs, representing a 50% improvement over GLM-5.2 on this in-house benchmark. No separate Flash score has been published.
34.5%%docs.z.ai β†—
CyberGym vulnerability discovery (GLM-5.3 flagship, generation reference)
Vendor-reported score for the GLM-5.3 flagship on vulnerability discovery, from Z.AI docs. Provided for generation-context; no separate Flash score has been published.
84.5%%docs.z.ai β†—

API Usage Examples

Use the global api.therouter.ai endpoint shown below for new integrations; the legacy China accelerated endpoint is retired.

cURL
curl https://api.therouter.ai/v1/chat/completions   -H "Content-Type: application/json"   -H "Authorization: Bearer $THE_ROUTER_API_KEY"   -d '{
    "model": "zai/glm-5.3-flash",
    "messages": [
      {"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the key points from this input."}
    ]
  }'

Vision + text chat

GLM-5.3-Flash accepts image_url content blocks alongside text. Pass the image as a URL or base64 data URI in the user message content array.

cURL
curl https://api.therouter.ai/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $THEROUTER_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "zai/glm-5.3-flash",
    "reasoning_effort": "low",
    "messages": [
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": [
          {"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "https://example.com/diagram.png"}},
          {"type": "text", "text": "Describe the architecture shown in this diagram."}
        ]
      }
    ],
    "max_tokens": 800
  }'

More from zai

Similar models

Cross-provider sibling models

News & changes

2026-08-19

GLM-5.3: Zhipu's Open-Source Flagship with 1M Context β€” API Integration and Routing Guide

TheRouter's routing guide for the GLM-5.3 generation covers benchmark context, migration from GLM-5.2, API integration with Z.AI and DashScope, and how to position GLM-5.3 and Flash in a multi-model policy.

re-authored by TheRouterTheRouter Blog β†—

Frequently asked

What is different between GLM-5.3-Flash and GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3-Flash adds image_url vision input β€” making it multimodal on input β€” and costs roughly 8–9x less per token than the GLM-5.3 flagship. The text parameters and 1M context are stated to match. The flagship is text-only and carries higher coding benchmark scores; the Flash is the budget and vision-capable route within the same generation.

Can I disable reasoning in GLM-5.3-Flash?

No. Like GLM-5.3, the Flash variant requires reasoning to always be enabled. The thinking.type: "disabled" parameter is removed. If you previously disabled thinking, switch to reasoning_effort: "low" before updating your model id β€” this is the lowest-overhead reasoning mode available.

Is GLM-5.3-Flash suitable for production vision pipelines?

The route is active and listed in TheRouter's catalog, so it is technically available for production. However, no independent benchmark data for GLM-5.3-Flash's vision capability has been published. Validate image understanding quality on your representative inputs before committing to a high-volume pipeline.

How does GLM-5.3-Flash compare to Google Gemini Flash for multimodal tasks?

Both are large-context, low-cost multimodal flash-tier models with image_url input. At $0.162/M input and $0.54/M output, GLM-5.3-Flash is competitively priced. The key differentiator is the always-on reasoning with selectable effort levels, which Gemini Flash does not expose in the same way. Choose based on ecosystem fit, independent vision benchmarks for your task type, and whether reasoning overhead is an acceptable latency tradeoff.

Fact ledger β€” every claim on this page traces here
sourceURLretrieved
Context windowdocs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Maximum output tokenstherouter.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Modalitiesdocs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Image inputdocs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Reasoningdocs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
TheRouter pricingtherouter.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Cost vs GLM-5.3 flagshiptherouter.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
API capabilitiesdocs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Generation familydocs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Training data cutoffβ€”β€”unknown
DeepSWE v1.1 (GLM-5.3 flagship, generation reference)docs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
Z.ai Code Bench Max (GLM-5.3 flagship, generation reference)docs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
CyberGym vulnerability discovery (GLM-5.3 flagship, generation reference)docs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18verified
GLM-5.3: Zhipu's Open-Source Flagship with 1M Context β€” API Integration and Routing GuideTheRouter Blog β†—2026-09-18verified
What is different between GLM-5.3-Flash and GLM-5.3?docs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18to verify
Can I disable reasoning in GLM-5.3-Flash?docs.z.ai β†—2026-09-18to verify
Is GLM-5.3-Flash suitable for production vision pipelines?therouter.ai β†—2026-09-18to verify
How does GLM-5.3-Flash compare to Google Gemini Flash for multimodal tasks?therouter.ai β†—2026-09-18to verify
Customer Support