Back to Models

MiniMax M2.5 Highspeed

minimaxminimax/m2.5-highspeed

MiniMax M2.5 Highspeed variant with ~100 tokens/sec output speed. Same capabilities as M2.5 at 2x cost for latency-sensitive applications.

MiniMax M2.5-Highspeed (also referred to as the Lightning variant) is the high-throughput version of MiniMax M2.5, released February 12, 2026. It shares the identical 230B-parameter MoE architecture (10B active per token) and the same Forge RL training regimen as the standard M2.5, but is served at a steady ~100 tokens per second β€” roughly double the standard variant's 50 TPS. On TheRouter it is priced at 2x the base M2.5 rate ($0.80/M input, $3.20/M output), exactly mirroring the official MiniMax pricing ratio between M2.5-Lightning and M2.5.

This variant is the right choice when end-to-end latency is the binding constraint β€” real-time agent interactions, user-facing chatbots, or throughput-sensitive batch workloads where a 100 TPS output rate meaningfully impacts user experience. For cost-optimized or sustained agent operations, the standard M2.5 variant (minimax/m2.5) at 50 TPS and half the price is the better default. Capability-wise both variants are identical: same 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified, same BrowseComp 76.3%, same tool-calling behavior. The only difference is throughput and cost.

Best for
  • β€’ Latency-sensitive agentic coding β€” same 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified capability at ~100 TPS, reducing end-to-end task time vs the standard variant. On SWE-Bench Verified this translates to ~15 minutes per task vs 22.8 min for the standard variant
  • β€’ Real-time user-facing chat agents where sub-second first-token latency and high throughput output matter more than cost
  • β€’ High-frequency tool-calling pipelines β€” parallel function calls across multiple tool invocations where throughput is the bottleneck
  • β€’ Same M2.5 strengths at higher speed: full-stack development, multi-language programming (13 languages), office productivity (Word, PPT, Excel financial modeling with 59.0% win rate on GDPval-MM)
Reach for something else if
  • β€’ Cost-optimized sustained agent uptime β€” the standard M2.5 variant at $0.40/$1.60 with 50 TPS is still fast and costs half as much. At continuous 100 TPS operation the Highspeed variant costs ~$2/hour vs ~$1/hour for standard
  • β€’ Multimodal tasks β€” text-only; no native image input, vision, or audio modalities. Pair with a vision model for screenshots or diagrams
  • β€’ Ultra-long generation beyond 64K tokens β€” max_completion is 65,536 tokens (same as standard M2.5). For longer uninterrupted generation, plan chunking or use a model with higher output limits
Context Length
205K
Max Output
66K
Input Priceper 1M tokens
$0.648/ 1M tokens
Output Priceper 1M tokens
$2.59/ 1M tokens

Modalities

text→text

Pricing Breakdown

TypeRate
Input$0.648 / 1M tokens
Output$2.59 / 1M tokens

Supported Parameters

temperaturemax_tokenstop_ptoolstool_choiceresponse_formatstop

Specifications

Release dateFebruary 12, 2026www.minimax.io β†—verified
Variant typeHighspeed / Lightning β€” capability-identical to M2.5 at 2x throughput (100 TPS) and 2x costwww.minimax.io β†—verified
ArchitectureMixture of Experts (MoE) β€” 230B total / 10B activated per tokenwww.minimax.io β†—verified
Output throughput~100 tokens per second (steady)www.minimax.io β†—verified
LicenseModified MIT β€” commercial use allowed with attribution (display 'MiniMax M2.5' on UI)github.com β†—verified
RL frameworkForge β€” agent-native RL framework with CISPO algorithmwww.minimax.io β†—verified
Training environments200,000+ real-world simulated environmentswww.minimax.io β†—verified
Training languagesGo, C, C++, TypeScript, Rust, Kotlin, Python, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Lua, Dart, Rubywww.minimax.io β†—verified

Benchmarks

BenchmarkDistributionScoreSource
SWE-bench Verified
Same score as standard M2.5 β€” capability-identical. On Droid scaffold: 79.7% (vs Opus 4.6 78.9%), on OpenCode scaffold: 76.1% (vs Opus 4.6 75.9%). Highspeed variant completes tasks ~37% faster end-to-end than M2.1; the standard variant matches Opus 4.6 speed at 22.8 min/task, and the Highspeed variant is proportionally faster.
80.2%www.minimax.io β†—
Multi-SWE-bench
First place at release β€” multi-language software engineering benchmark. Same score as standard M2.5.
51.3%www.minimax.io β†—
BrowseComp
With context management enabled. Same score as standard M2.5 β€” capability-identical across all benchmarks.
76.3%www.minimax.io β†—

API Usage Examples

Use the global api.therouter.ai endpoint shown below for new integrations; the legacy China accelerated endpoint is retired.

cURL
curl https://api.therouter.ai/v1/chat/completions   -H "Content-Type: application/json"   -H "Authorization: Bearer $THE_ROUTER_API_KEY"   -d '{
    "model": "minimax/m2.5-highspeed",
    "messages": [
      {"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the key points from this input."}
    ]
  }'

Chat completion

M2.5-Highspeed uses the same OpenAI-compatible v1/chat/completions endpoint as any TheRouter model. Simply set the model field to minimax/m2.5-highspeed.

cURL
curl https://api.therouter.ai/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $THEROUTER_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"minimax/m2.5-highspeed","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Write a React component for a file uploader with drag-and-drop support."}]}'

More from minimax

Similar models

Cross-provider sibling models

News & changes

2026-02-12

MiniMax M2.5 released with Lightning (Highspeed) variant

MiniMax released M2.5, an open-weight frontier model achieving 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified and 51.3% Multi-SWE-Bench. The model ships in two throughput tiers: standard (50 TPS) and Lightning/Highspeed (100 TPS). Both variants share the same architecture, benchmarks, and capabilities β€” only speed and pricing differ.

re-authored by TheRouterminimax.io/news β†—

Frequently asked

What's the difference between minimax/m2.5 and minimax/m2.5-highspeed?

Both variants share the exact same architecture, weights, and capabilities β€” same SWE-Bench scores, same tool-calling behavior, same context length. The only difference is throughput: M2.5-Highspeed runs at ~100 tokens/sec at 2x the cost, while standard M2.5 runs at ~50 tokens/sec at half the price. Choose Highspeed when latency is the priority; choose standard when cost efficiency matters more.

re-authored by TheRouter
Is M2.5-Highspeed considered a different model or just a speed tier?

MiniMax describes M2.5-Lightning as the same model in a faster serving tier. Both variants use identical weights and architecture β€” they are not independently trained models. On TheRouter they appear as separate slugs because each variant has its own pricing and throughput characteristics, but the model output is identical for the same input.

re-authored by TheRouter
Fact ledger β€” every claim on this page traces here
sourceURLretrieved
Release datewww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Variant typewww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Architecturewww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Output throughputwww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Licensegithub.com β†—2026-05-27verified
RL frameworkwww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Training environmentswww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Training languageswww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
SWE-bench Verifiedwww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
Multi-SWE-benchwww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
BrowseCompwww.minimax.io β†—2026-05-27verified
MiniMax M2.5 released with Lightning (Highspeed) variantminimax.io/news β†—2026-05-27verified
Help & contact